![]() Although the issue is close, we conclude that the evidence did not conclusively establish that there were no triable issues of material fact regarding the meaning of the parties' implied agreement and whether what the plaintiff employee did amounted to "good cause" to terminate within that meaning. Both sides presented skillfully prepared and helpful letter briefs. To assist in further development of the issues, we authorized further briefing. It is not so clear from the evidence presented, however, that a reasonable trier of fact would necessarily have to resolve the issues in favor of the defendant employer. ![]() The evidence suggests a strong possibility, perhaps a strong likelihood, that a trier of fact would resolve the issues in favor of the defendant employer on the "good cause" termination issue. The trial court granted summary judgment for the defendant employer. Plaintiff employee sued defendant employer for 1) breach of an implied-in-fact contract not to terminate except for "good cause," and 2) age discrimination. APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Los Angeles, Alexander H.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |